CULTURAL RESOURCES OFFICE
PRESERVATION BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
MONDAY DECEMBER 10, 2001
1015 LOCUST ST., SUITE 1200
4:00 P.M.


agenda no: address:

(Click address to link to agenda page)
101.0233 4159 RUSSELL
101.1438 2232 RUTGER STREET
101.1631 1906 ANGELICA
101.1758 3540 N. GRAND
101.1941 4052 CASTLEMAN
101.1964 2312 S. 12TH STREET
101.2004 3675 CASTLEMAN
101.2014 3866 FLORA PLACE
101.2033 2652 GEYER AVENUE
101.2061 4270 CASTLEMAN
SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM

APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL

101.0233 4159 RUSSELL BOULEVARD (CB 4939 - Shaw Neighborhood HD)


Applicant: Building Division
Owner: Will Moore
DEMOLITION PLAN: Building Division condemnation for demolition of a two-story brick two-family building.
PREVIOUS ACTION: 2/22/01 - Application for Condemnation
2/23/01 - Director denied condemnation as the building was in sound condition.
STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance #64832

  1. Redevelopment Plans
    The proposed demolition is not called for in any Redevelopment plan.
  2. Architectural Quality:
    4159 Russell is a buff brick vernacular building with Romanesque Revival and Classic Revival influence. Individually, it is not of outstanding architectural design; however, it is an important element in a singularly-unified and intact streetscape.
  3. Condition:
    The building, while deteriorated, has no major structural problems. The Building Division , when it cited it for condemnation, listed no violations except that the building had been vacant for over 12 months.
  4. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential:
    1. Neighborhood Potential:
      The building is part of an intact streetscape, surrounded by similar buildings of identical scale, materials and date of construction: its loss would undermine the character of the neighborhood and street. It would be the first demolition on either side of the block.
  5. Urban Design:
    Contributing.

APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL

101.1438 2232 RUTGER STREET (CB 2266 - Lafayette Square H.D.)


Applicant and Owner: Anton T. Brinckwirth
RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Construct a retaining wall at the front facade.
PREVIOUS ACTION: 8.16.01 - Building Permit applied for
8/21/01 - Denied by staff.
9/7/01 - Appealed by applicant
10/10/01 - Approved by Board
10/17/01 - Appealed by Lafayette Square Restoration Group.
STAFF COMMENTS: The retaining wall is made of landscape timbers, and is extremely visible. It was constructed without a permit, and does not meet the standards.

Under Ordinance #63327, the Lafayette Square standards state:
402.2 Definition: A retaining wall is constructed to allow change in grade from one side of the wall to the other.

  1. New and reconstructed retaining walls shall be based on a Model Example.
  2. The exposed side of a retaining wall shall be vertical.
  3. The top of the retaining wall shall be horizontal, and shall extend a maximum of 8 inches above the high point of the grade retained.

    (Comment: New and reconstructed retaining walls shall replicate the appearance of an historic wall. Thsu stone or brickmay be applied as a veneer to a concrete wall as long as the outward appearance meets the visual qualitieis of the Model Example.)

  4. The following types of retaining wall veneers are prohibited at Public and Intermediate Facades:
    1. Railroad ties
    2. Landscape timbers
    3. Concrete block of any type
    4. Exposed cast-in-place or precast concrete
    5. Stucco which does not simulate cut stone.

PRELIMINARY REVIEW

101.1631 1906 ANGELICA (CB 2406 - Hyde Park H.D.)


Applicant: Hon. Freeman Bosley, Sr. Owner: LRA
DEMOLITION PLAN: Demolish two-story brick building.
STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance #64832

  1. Redevelopment Plans
    The staff is unable to confirm that the proposed demolition is called for in a Redevelopment Plan.
  2. Architectural Quality:
    The building is classified as contributing to the historic district. Built in 1890, this two story, two family, Second Empire residence contributes the existing intact streetscape, which presently has no vacant lots along this block.
  3. Condition:
    The building is in disrepair, however it is salvageable. The exterior walls are sound except for a small hole in the north wall, and the roof is missing at the rear of the house. The building shares an interior, structural wall with the residence at 1908 Angelica.
    Demolition of this building would result in the deterioration of the other, which is in good condition and occupied.
  4. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential:
    1. Neighborhood Potential:
      The neighborhood is a National Register Historic District. Demolition of this building would have an adverse effect on the district. The building is eligible for state and federal Historic Preservation tax credits.
  5. Urban Design:
    Contributing.
  6. Proposed Subsequent Construction.
    After the proposed demolition, the lot will be sold to a neighbor and used as green space

PRELIMINARY REVIEW

101.1758 3540 N. GRAND AVENUE (C.B. 5215 - Preservation Review District )


Applicant & Owner: LRA/Gee Stuart, Director of Real Estate, SLDC
DEMOLITION PLAN: Demolish three story brick building.
STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance #64832

  1. Redevelopment Plans
    The proposed demolition is not called for in any Redevelopment Plan.
  2. Architectural Quality:
    The building is classified as contributing. It is a three story, vernacular brick apartment building with influences of Renaissance Revival and Arts and Crafts styles. It was built in the late 19th Century.
  3. Condition: The building is sound under definition of the ordinance.
  4. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential:
    1. Neighborhood Potential:
      The neighborhood is eligible for listing on the National Register. The buildings date mainly from the late-19th to early 20th Century. The lost of this massive building would have a negative impact on the streetscape of this area.
  5. Urban Design:
    Contributing.
  6. Proposed Subsequent Construction.
    A parking lot is planned for this location.

APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL

101.1941 4052 CASTLEMAN AVENUE (C.B. 4942 - Shaw Neighborhood HD )


Applicant: City of St. Louis Building Division
Owners: Julie and Menas Karagiannis
DEMOLITION PLAN: Building Division condemnation for demolition of two-story brick two-family building.
STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance #64832

  1. Redevelopment Plans
    The proposed demolition is not called for in any Redevelopment plan.
  2. Architectural Quality:
    The building is a brick vernacular building with Romanesque Revival and Classic Revival influence. Individually, it is not of outstanding architectural design; however, it is an element in an already disturbed streetscape.
  3. Condition:
    The building, while deteriorated, has no major structural problems. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential:
    1. Neighborhood Potential:
      The building is part of an streetscape that has suffered other demolitions. Loss of this building would continue the damage to the historic streetscape and district.
  4. Urban Design:
    Contributing.
  5. Proposed Subsequent Construction
    None.

APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL

101.1964 2312 S. 12TH STREET (CB 800 - Soulard HD)


Owners and Applicants - Russell L. and Robert E. Ramsey
RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Install 15 windows in historic building.
PREVIOUS ACTION: 10/18/01 - Stop Work Order issued.
10/23/01 - Application for Building Permit.
11/2/01 - Denied.
11/9/01 - Appealed by Owner.
STAFF COMMENTS: The wood windows on the front facade were installed within the original frames, resulting in smaller windows and mismatched arches at the top of the windows.

Ordinance #57078, the Soulard Historic District standards state:

  1. Windows in public facades shall be one of the following:
    1. a replacement window which duplicates the original and meets the following requirements;
  2. The profiles of the muntins, sashes, frames and moldings shall match the original elements in dimension and configuration.

NEW APPLICATION

101.2004 3675 CASTLEMAN AVENUE (C.B. 4950 - Shaw Neighborhood H.D. )


Applicants/Owners: Lawrence and Karen Goering
RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Construct "Versa-lok" concrete retaining wall in side yard of single-family residence.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Shaw Neighborhood Historic District Standards state:
"G. Walls, Fences and Enclosures:
Yard dividers, walls, enclosures or fences in front of building line are not permitted. Fences or walls on or behind the building line, when prominently visible from the street, should be of wood, stone, brick, brick-faced concrete, ornamental iron or dark-painted chain link.."

The staff recommends that per historic district standards, the permit application should be denied as not in compliance.

However, should the Board determine that the retaining wall is required, the design of the wall should replicate a historic stone retaining wall in design and materials.


NEW APPLICATION

101.2014 3866 FLORA PLACE (C.B. 2117 - Shaw Neighborhood H.D. )


Applicants/Owners: Dwayne adn Melinda Sanderson
RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Application to construct "Versa-lok" concrete retaining wall in side yard of single-family residence. Also to erect 6-foot high wood and metal privacy fence in rear and side yard, and low wrought-iron fence in front yard.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Shaw Neighborhood Historic District Standards state:
"G. Walls, Fences and Enclosures:
Yard dividers, walls, enclosures or fences in front of building line are not permitted. Fences or walls on or behind the building line, when prominently visible from the street, should be of wood, stone, brick, brick-faced concrete, ornamental iron or dark-painted chain link.."

The staff recommends that per historic district standards, the permit application should be denied as not in compliance.

However, should the Board determine that the retaining wall is required, the design of the wall should replicate a historic stone retaining wall in design and materials. Fences should not extend in front of the building line on Flora Place.


PRELIMINARY REVIEW

101.2033 2652 GEYER AVENUE (C.B. 1322 - Compton Hill HD )


Owner/Applicant: LRA/Gee Stuart, Director of Real Estate, SLDC
DEMOLITION PLAN: Demolish three-story commercial/residential building.
STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance #64832

  1. Redevelopment Plans
    The proposed demolition is not called for in any Redevelopment plan.
  2. Architectural Quality:
    2652 Geyer is an unusual property type, comprised of a four-family flat on the east and a corner commercial storefront with two stories of residential above. A three-story commercial block such as this is unusual in the City. Stylistically, the building is influenced by the Romanesque Revival style, and displays considerable decorative brick detailing.
  3. Condition:
    The building is vacant and deteriorated. While the roof and rear porches have collapsed, the exterior walls appear sound. There are several small holes at the south cornice line made by vandals attempting to remove decorative brick. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential:
    1. Neighborhood Potential:
      The building is part of an intact streetscape, surrounded by similar buildings of identical scale, materials and date of construction: its loss would undermine the character of the neighborhood and street. It would be the first demolition on either side of the block. The building is located in a Certified Local Historic District, making it eligible for rehabilitation tax credits of 25% of the costs of rehabilitation.
  4. Urban Design:
    Contributing. The building is a corner building and its loss will adversely affect the streetscape of both Geyer and Ohio.
  5. Proposed Subsequent Construction
    None.

PRELIMINARY REVIEW

101.2061 4270 CASTLEMAN (C.B. 4836 - Shaw Neighborhood HD )


Owner/Applicant: LRA/Gee Stuart, Director of Real Estate, SLDC
DEMOLITION PLAN: Demolish two-story brick building.
STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance #64832

  1. Redevelopment Plans
    The proposed demolition is not required by a Redevelopment plan.
  2. Architectural Quality:
    The building is classified as contributing to the Shaw Certified Local Historic District. It is a two story brick, four-family built in the Romanesque Revival style. The building was built in the late 19th Century.
  3. Condition:
    The building is sound under the definition of the ordinance. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential:
    1. Neighborhood Potential:
      The neighborhood is a Certified Local Historic District. The buildings date mainly from the mid-19th to early 20th Century. This building is eligible for State and Federal Historic Preservation tax credits.
  4. Urban Design:
    Contributing.
  5. Proposed Subsequent Construction
    No construction is proposed at this time.

SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM

Staff presentation concerning Preservation Board, its duties and responsibilities.