Cultural Resource Office

Preservation Board

Regular Meeting

MONDAY, JANUARY 8, 2001

1015 LOCUST STREET, SUITE 1200

3:00 P.M.

100.0944 APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL 1200 RUSSELL 1

100.1217 APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL 1200 RUSSELL 2

100.1271 Appeal 4373 WEST PINE 3

100.1459 APPEAL OF DECISION 6014 DELMAR 4

100.1490 APPEAL OF ADMIN. DENIAL 2421 SO. 13TH 5

100.1612 New Application 4484 WESTMINSTER PL. 6

100.1627 NEW APPLICATION 4386 WESTMINSTER PL. 7

100.1645 APPEAL OF DECISION 710 RUSSELL 8

100.1663 PRELIMINARY REVIEW 1923 SO. 9TH ST. 9

100.1839 PRELIMINARY REVIEW 4200 LINDELL 10

Special Agenda Item: Landmark Designation - The Monroe School 11

Special Agenda Item: Historic District Designation - Grand and Gravois Historic Commercial District 12


APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL

 

 

100.0944 1200 Russell Avenue (CB 783 — Soulard Historic District)

Owner and Appellant — James P. Halloran

 

COMMERCIAL PLAN: Erect projecting canopy/awning over entryway.

PREVIOUS ACTION: 8/9/00 — Director administratively denied application due to time constraints per ordinance.

Appealed: October 17. 2000

Appellant: James P. Halloran, owner

STAFF COMMENTS: The Soulard Historic District Standards state:

"Accessories:

New awnings or canopies shall be based on a Model Example and shall be:

The same size and shape as the window, door or storefront behind; constructed of a fabric material....Backlit awnings are prohibited." (207.4)

Under the standards, any canopy must replicate a model example, existing within the Soulard district prior to 1929. A projecting canopy as proposed would not be appropriate for the date of the building. The applicant has not attempted to provide the staff with any possible model example, and the permit was denied because of time requirements under the ordinance, and no response from the applicant to our request for revisions.

 

top of list

APPEAL OF STAFF DENIAL

 

 

100.1217 1200 Russell Avenue (CB 783 — Soulard Historic District)


Owner and Appellant — James P. Halloran

 

COMMERCIAL PLAN: Erect 40-foot internal halyard aluminum flag pole in sidewalk tree well.

PREVIOUS ACTION: 9/28/00 — Director denied application as not in compliance with historic district standards.

Appealed: October 17. 2000

Appellant: James P. Halloran, owner

STAFF COMMENTS: The Soulard Historic District Standards state:

"Accessories:

New or reused metal accessories shall be based on a Model Example." (207.1)

There is no historic evidence that flags or flagpoles were ever erected as proposed in the public right-of-way in Soulard. In addition, the scale of this flagpole will overwhelm the buildings and streetscape.

top of list

APPEAL

 

 

 

100.1271 4373 West Pine (CB 3907 — Preservation Review District No. 13)


Applicant — Bellon Wrecking and Salvage

Owner — Hendricks Consulting, Inc.

DEMOLITION PLAN: Demolish two story brick building for new construction

STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance 64832

A. Redevelopment Plans.

The proposed demolition is not called for in any Redevelopment Plan.

B. Architectural Quality.

The building is classified as high merit due to its association with a person of importance in the history of the development of St. Louis and the remaining significant architectural features which include a large unique stained glass window, a surprisingly intact interior and a fine carriage house with virtually no significant alterations.

C. Condition.

The building is sound and stabile but in deteriorated condition. The east corner tower and pitched roof appear to have been removed in the 1960's when the building was converted to a nursing home. The front exterior decorative sandstone was also covered with "perma-stone" at that time.

D. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential.

1. Neighborhood Potential:

The neighborhood is a quiet residential enclave with many fine buildings dating from the late 19th and early 20th Centuries. The property values are generally higher than the median for the City.

2. Reuse Potential:

The building is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register because of its association with the history of the City and because the Landmark's Association of St. Louis is conducting a survey to list the neighborhood in the National Register of Historic Places. The carriage house proposed for demolition is one of the few remaining examples of high style ancillary structures.

3. Economic Hardship:

The owner is a not-for-profit corporation which has not submitted enough information to make a determination concerning financial hardship.

E. Urban Design.

The Office shall evaluate the following urban design factors:

1. (The effect of a proposed partial demolition on attached or row buildings)

Not Applicable.

2. The block face is generally intact with the exception of the low rise contemporary building with is attached to the east.

3. Demolition could have an adverse effect on the proposed National Register nomination.

4. A single family residential building is allowed under present zoning.

F. Proposed Subsequent Construction.

(Notwithstanding the provisions of any ordinance to the contrary, the Office shall evaluate proposed subsequent construction on the site of proposed demolition based upon whether:

1. The applicant has demonstrated site control by ownership or an option contract)

The owner has demonstrated site control

2. (The proposed construction would equal or exceed the contribution of the structure to the integrity of the existing streetscape and block face. Proposal for creation of vacant land by demolition(s) in question will be evaluated as to appropriateness on that particular site, within that specific block. Parking lots will be given favorable consideration when directly adjoining/abutting facilities require additional off-street parking.)

The proposed replacement building will be stylistically compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, however it will not be contributing to a District due to its age.

3. (The proposed construction will be architecturally compatible with the existing block face as to building setbacks, scale, articulation and rhythm, overall architectural character and general use of exterior materials or colors:)

The proposed construction will be architecturally compatible.

4. (The proposed use complies with current zoning requirements)

Proposed new use is a conditional use.

5. (The proposed new construction would commence within twelve (12) months from the application date.)

Yes.

G. Commonly Controlled Property.

(If a demolition application concerns property adjoining occupied property and if common control of both properties is documented, favorable consideration will generally be given to appropriate reuse proposals. Appropriate uses shall include those allowed under the current zoning classification, reuse for expansion of an existing conforming, commercial or use or a use consistent with a presently conforming, adjoining use group. Potential for substantial expansion of an existing adjacent commercial use will be given due consideration.)

The application satisfies this requirement, although the new use will require a conditional use permit.

top of list

APPEAL OF DECISION

 

 

 

100.1459 6014 Delmar Blvd. (CB 5422 — Skinker-DeBaliviere H.D. )


Owners — 7171 Delmar LLC/ St. Louis Design Alliance Architects/ Deborah Bauer

Applicant — RM Signs - Donna Krieger

 

SIGNAGE PROPOSAL: Install one non-illuminated ground sign per plans.

PREVIOUS ACTION: 11/21/2000 – Administratively denied due to ordinance time constraints.

Appealed: 11/27/2000

Appellant: Debbie Bauer

Saint Louis Design Alliance

6014 Delmar Blvd.

St. Louis, Missouri 63112

STAFF COMMENTS: Per the Skinker – DeBaliviere – Catlin Tract – Parkview Historic District Standards:
"…The design of any proposed construction or extensive alteration must be reviewed considering the existing structures on the street. Regarding existing older building, the recognition, maintenance and enhancement of their historical characteristics is encouraged. New buildings on Skinker and Delmar Boulevards must be sited and be of a scale that complements the houses on adjacent residential streets, and also contributes to the establishment of an orderly streetscape appropriate to major boulevards".

The base of the sign will be skirted per the requirements of the Redevelopment Authority; however, the scale of the sign is not consistent with signs for businesses within storefront commercial buildings throughout the Loop area. Staff has requested that the total area of the sign and its base be restricted to thirty square feet.

The sign will be set at a forty-five-degree angle and will only be visible to eastbound traffic.

top of list

Appeal of Administrative denial

 

 

    1. 2421 S. 13th Street (C.B. 819 - Soulard Historic District)


Owner — Kristine Lynn Hartmann

Applicant — Bullock Garages

 

RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Construct two-car frame garage.

STAFF COMMENTS: The Soulard Historic District Standards state:

"The mass and scale of garages and carports shall be appropriate for their use and shall not visually dominate the main building. " (303.)

Although the proposed garage is sited at the alley, it is not placed directly behind the main house. Staff is concerned that the scale of the garage will be dominant.

top of list

NEW APPLICATION

 

 

100.1612 4484 Westminster Place — (CB 4580 - Central West End H.D.)


Bernard G. and Sharee D. Paulus — owners and applicants

 

RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Replace windows on two-story residence, including eight doublehung windows on the front facade.

STAFF COMMENTS:

The Central West End historic district standards state: "Architectural details on existing structures shall be maintained in a similar size, detail and material....Both new and replacement windows and door frames shall be limited to wood or color finished aluminum."

Windows were replaced without a permit. Original windows were one-over-one wood sash; the new windows replicate the original window pattern, but do not comply with historic district requirements in material or proportion.

The contractor who replaced these windows was Castle Windows, who is responsible for several other unapproved window replacements in the immediate neighborhood.

top of list

NEW APPLICATION

 

 

100.1627 4386 Westminster (CB 4581 – Central West End HD)


Applicant and Owner — Harry K. & Deborah L. Ratliff

RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Install vinyl windows on front facade of historic building.

STAFF COMMENTS: Owner installed two (2) vinyl windows on the second-story and four (4) vinyl storm windows on the first-story of the front facade without a permit.

The Central West End historic district standards state: "Architectural details on existing structures shall be maintained in a similar size, detail and material....Both new and replacement windows and door frames shall be limited to wood or color finished aluminum."

top of list

APPEAL OF DECISION

 

 

 

100.1645 710 Russell Blvd. (CB 779 – Soulard Historic District)


Energy Marketing 2001 LLC/ Steve Madras - Owner

Bill Yount Signs/ Robert Williams - Applicant

 

SIGNAGE PROPOSAL: Erect one pole sign and three canopy signs (internally illuminated) per plans.

PREVIOUS ACTION: 11/14/2000 – Denied. Proposal exceeds Soulard Historic District Standards.

Appealed: 11/16/2000

Appellant: Robert E. Williams

Bill Yount Signs & Advertising, Inc.

2002 Woodson Rd.

St. Louis, MO 63114

STAFF COMMENTS: Per the Soulard Historic District Standards:
"Commercial signs at structures serving a commercial purpose at the time of adoption of these Standards shall not exceed 40 square feet on each public facade or 10 percent of the area of each public facade, whichever is smaller. Each side of a protruding sign counts toward the 40 square feet so they may not be more than 20 square feet or 5 percent of the surface area whichever is smaller."

Signs may not be placed in the following locations: On a parapet; On a pole; or On any site separate from the building. Signs may only be lit by fixed steady front lighting. Back lighting is prohibited.

The Soulard Restoration Group Code and Zoning Committee has submitted a letter expressing that they have no objection to the proposal.

top of list

PRELIMINARY REVIEW

 

 

100.1663 1923 S. 9TH (CB 666 - Soulard Historic District)


Owner — George Obernagle

Applicant — Tony Gennaro

 

 

RESIDENTIAL PLAN: Interior and exterior rehabilitation of a pre-1859 three-quarter house.

Staff Comments:

1. The Soulard Historic District Standards state:

"Reconstructed masonry walls shall have the mortar thickness and coursing to match the original."(202.1)

Inappropriate repointing, with wide and unstruck joints and an excessively hard mortar, has already been completed without a permit.

The staff has met with the contractor who appears willing to adhere to historic standards. However, the existing condition of the masonry and pointing on the front facade is a signficant concern: the building is of soft brick, and the mortar extends over the brick in many locations. The staff is recommending that at a minimum, the front facade, including the foundation, be appropriately repointed, using mortar of sufficient softness to protect the building.

2. The original entry has been blocked down and significantly altered. Originally an open entry to a side gallery, at some time a solid door with paneled sidelights and transom was added several feet back from the front facade. The applicant proposes to replace this inappropriate construction with a new door, sidelights and transom in the same location. Repair to a portion of the brick wall adjacent to the entry is also proposed.

The staff feels that if the exterior opening and existing stone steps are properly restored, it is reasonable to allow a new, glazed entryway at this location.

top of list

PRELIMINARY REVIEW

 

 

100.1839 4200 LINDELL (CB 3914 LINDELL HISTORIC DISTRICT )

Owner - Walgreen's Company, Inc.

Applicant - Carnahan and Garvin, L.L.C.

 

DEMOLITION PLAN Demolish one story brick building for new construction

STAFF COMMENTS: Under Ordinance 64689:

A. Redevelopment Plans:

The proposed demolition is not called for in any Redevelopment Plan.

B. Architectural Quality: The building is a brick commercial building which is somewhat architecturally compatible with its commercial context.

C. Condition: The building is sound.

D. Neighborhood Effect and Reuse Potential.:

Demolition and new construction will not be per se incompatible provided that the proposed new construction plan is harmonious with the surrounding context.

E. Urban Design: Commercial site.

F. Proposed Subsequent Construction:

The Office has not yet reviewed final plans for proposed new construction.

G. Commonly Controlled Property:

If a demolition application concerns property adjoining occupied property and if common control of both properties is documented, favorable consideration will generally be given to appropriate reuse proposals.

top of list


SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM

 

 

Landmark Designation — The Monroe school — 3705 South Broadway

Owner — City of St. Louis Board of Education

Applicant — Hon. Craig S. Schmid, 10th Ward Alderman

top of list

 

 

 

 

SPECIAL AGENDA ITEM

 

Historic District Designation — Grand & Gravois Historic Commercial District


Owners — South Side National Bank, Friends & Luvers, Inc., Jonathan A. Gold, Karlo & Miroslava Perhat

Applicants — Hon. Craig Schmidt, 10th Ward Alderman and Hon. Marge Vining, 8th Ward Alderman

top of list