Core Result 1, Parents Working
Revitalization plan, July 1999 draft

Return to core results contents.

Issue Statement
   The 1990 U.S. Census reported a 16.3 percent unemployment rate for the Forest Park Southeast neighborhood, while the City of St. Louis rate is considerably lower at between four and six percent. The statistic does not account for individuals failing to file for unemployment or non-reported employment. Thus, the unemployment rate for FPSE may be understated. The median family income was $15,737 and the average family household size was 2.67 persons.

   Neighborhood Connection serves as an outreach and clearinghouse for human service agencies in the FPSE neighborhood. Neighborhood Connection is a cost effective, 24 hour a day, 365 days a year, telephone service that helps individuals and families improve their quality of life by bridging the gap between clients who need services and existing social service agencies and their programs. In 1998 Neighborhood Connection conducted a study in FPSE which reported 38% of residents in FPSE in full time employment and approximately 21% unemployed. The data is consistent with information from 1990 Census data. Their report shows:

Table 3.1 Neighborhood Connection Employment Study 1998
Type of
employment
Number of
residents
  
Percent
Full-time 56 38.095
Part-time 16 10.884
Unemployed 31 21.088
Student 18 12.245
Retired 13 8.844
Other 13 8.844
Total 147 100.000
   Similar to other communities with high unemployment rates, FPSE is plagued with barriers such as transportation, quality day care, day care during non-traditional working hours, education, life skills, self-esteem, mental health issues, substance abuse and misperception. In addition, individuals living day to day and paycheck to paycheck may not see the incentive to leaving work for further job training or taking a job that pays less with benefits over a job that may pay more, but without benefits. Such challenges make finding successful employment difficult for individuals without a strong support network within the community. Many stable jobs have left the City to the suburbs and many support services are two bus rides away. By strengthening programs within the community, the individual has an increased chance of getting need support services to finding successful employment.

   Another indicator of the need to address unemployment and underemployment in FPSE is reflected in the 1997 Project Respond data indicating that over 50 percent of the children in the 63110 zip code, which includes FPSE, received TANF/AFDC in 1996. While we have no doubt that most households are struggling to provide a health nurturing environment for their children it is also clear that many are not succeeding. If one of our goals is to maintain the diversity of income, race and age which has been the hallmark of FPSE, then efforts to assist and support neighborhood residents in this struggle to overcome the myriad of obstacles to adequate housing, successful employment and health care is paramount.

   In FPSE, the strategy for parents working in FPSE addresses the barriers to employment and addresses the need for support even after gaining successful employment. Our strategy attempts to provide the support services an individual' needs to retain employment with adequate wages and benefits. FPSE looks at successful employment as one that addresses a household's economic needs, physical needs, mental needs and health needs over the long term.

Benchmarks Baseline Analysis
   Data in above tables show that individuals in FPSE are having serious difficulties finding and retaining gainful employment. The FPSE Employment Referral Service Center, an outgrowth of the HUD grant, reported in 1998, that out of 133 neighborhood residents who came to the center, 29 did not graduate from high school and 84 participants completed high school or obtained a GED. While we do not know if this representative of the educational achievement of unemployed residents of FPSE we do know that this group named child care and transportation as the most significant obstacles to employment, not education. This suggests that efforts to focus on stronger links to support services and maintaining those links are crucial to parents working.

   Employment data regarding employment in this proposal points to the use of a "place 0based employment support". The Corporation for Supportive Housing (CSH) reported to the Rockefeller Foundation in A Concept Paper for Place-Based Employment Initiative (1998) that,

If communities are to be assisted out of poverty, it will be necessary to cross service, funding and bureaucratic disciplines and to integrate resources on the neighborhood level. We reaffirmed for ourselves that the case management model of integrating resources for people (i.e. providing services) is an effective way for programs to develop trusting, long-term relationships with community residents in order to help them, and that case management service models are most easily and effectively implemented at the community level.
   In November 1997, CSH began a research effort to identify strategies for increasing employment within disadvantaged neighborhoods. Their model is drawn largely from research into best practices and thinking on employment-driven, neighborhood focused and anti-poverty strategies. CSH's report is also based on a three-year program that attempted to raise the rate of employment among formerly homeless tenants of 21 supportive housing providers in three cities.

   Our strategy for parents working is based on the notion that holistic employment services delivered on a community based level provides a stronger support for achieving successful employment. It is self-evident that an unemployment rate of 16.3% is not only problematic for the individual who is unemployed, but her/his family and, by extension, the larger community.

Strategies
Performance Measures
   The employment team is responsible for monitoring the employment program through impact assessments and enrollment efforts. Reports from the assessments will be made to the FPSE Community Council and other stakeholders on a quarterly basis. As a result of the outreach, evaluation and support efforts of the employment supervisor and organizers the Human Service Project Manager and the employment team will evaluate the degree of achievement of the benchmarks. Budget

Item

# of units

Cost per unit

1 year cost

5 year cost

8% inflation

Total inflation

Potential

Funders

Employment Supervisor

1

$30,000

$30,000

$150,000

$2,400

$9,600

* State agencies

Employment Organizers

3

$26,000

$78,000

$390,000

$6,240

$24,960

Benefits (25%)

4

 

$27,000

$135,000

$2,160

$8,640

Office supplies

 

$12,000

$12,000

$60,000

$960

$3,830

Computer and software

4

$1,500

$6,000

     

Printer

4

$600

$2,400

     

Neighborhood Connections Program Director

1

$30,000

$30,000

$150,000

$2,400

$9,600

Benefits

 

$7,500

$7,500

$37,500

$600

$2,400

Research and evaluation

 

$2500

$2500

$12,500

$200

$800

Space and utilities

 

$3,600

$3,600

$18,000

$288

$1152

Outreach and brochures

 

$1,500

$1,500

$7,500

$120

$480

Office supplies

 

$1,200

$1,200

$6,000

$96

$384

Survey respondent renumeration

100

$10

$1,000

$5,000

   

Total for 5 years

     

$971,500

 

$61846

$1,033,346

Return to top of this Core Result 1 page, or
to core results contents.